Mr. J, a Former Professor Series – Entry 30: Don’t Just Threaten My Future. Because I’m Going To Archive Your Present
They don’t protect you, and sure they don’t forbid me from exposing you
This excerpt is quoted from official correspondence received from Queensland Police Service. Officer name and personal identifiers have been redacted to protect privacy. The quote is presented as-is, without modification, for the purpose of public interest commentary and survivor documentation.
Email received: June 3, 2025
There is a peculiar tactic favored by abusers and insecure academics alike: when they run out of narrative control, they pivot to threatening your future.
“No university will ever accept you.”
“You’re damaging your chances.”
“Nobody will want to work with someone like you.”
Let’s dissect that.
Public Note published by Pat Johnston (captured June 16, 2025; archived prior to deletion)
Academic admissions do not punish victims for speaking up
In Australia — and in most Five Eyes countries — universities do not reject applicants for publicly documenting harassment or abuse.
Admissions decisions are based on:
Academic merit.
Research vision and statements of purpose.
English proficiency and GPA.
References and professional fit.
They do not blacklist articulate survivors. In fact, whistleblowing and advocacy are often viewed as markers of integrity, resilience, and leadership.
When you threaten my future, you don’t break the law — you build my evidence archive
The “future sabotage threat” is psychological warfare
When they say, “You’ll never be accepted,” what they really mean is:
“I want you to fear losing something precious enough to make you shut up.”
But the moment you stop fearing loss, their entire threat structure collapses.
When someone stops arguing facts and starts threatening futures, they’ve already lost the narrative.
The irony: threats create more receipts
When someone tries to coerce you into silence, they generate the very evidence that proves your point:
They show an intent to control.
They reveal obsession with power over your life narrative.
They confirm their desperation to maintain the final word.
In my case, these threats became archive entries — lines in my Substack, evidence logs, footnotes in future impact statements.
When you threaten my future, remember: I have already archived your present — in every jurisdiction you run to.
Articulate survivors are ungovernable
I didn’t just document his behavior. I turned it into an academic syllabus, publicly indexed and timestamped.
He didn’t just lose control of the narrative — he handed it to me on a silver platter.
Identity & Jurisdiction Notice
I hold verified copies of the respondent’s passports, shared voluntarily during our past relationship. These documents — one issued by the UK and another by Australia — establish legal identity and cross-border jurisdiction. Sensitive details have been redacted; they are used solely to confirm identity to authorities, not for public dissemination.
These materials are already submitted to QPS and other relevant agencies as part of formal harassment and defamation reports. They are included here to clarify that the same individual behind these repeated threats and defamatory accusations (including false tax evasion claims) has been formally identified.
Read my related publication here:
Mr. J, a Former Professor Series – Entry 8: What Makes a Scholar Dangerous
Mr. J, a Former Professor Series - Entry 19: The Coward Behind the Clone
I do not publish this to humiliate, but to preserve the integrity of the record and to counter ongoing impersonation attempts.
Should these defamatory claims continue, I reserve the right to pursue further legal complaints — with full supporting documentation under both domestic and international defamation laws.
When I say evidence, I don’t just mean screenshots. I mean passports, logs, and police files.
This image has been redacted to remove all sensitive data. It is used solely for public interest commentary and ethical analysis.
A final note for Johnston
You threatened my future.
I archived your present.
I don’t just survive. I don’t just expose. I could literally turn you into a compulsory ethics lecture.
Next time you threaten me, remember: I have a projector and a syllabus.
And now, your narrative lives exactly where you cannot touch it: in public memory.
Some victims stay silent. Some fight back. I document, meme, archive, and keep receipts for dessert.
Note on Naming:
The subject of these verses is identified by name due to the severity of the public threats made during that period.
Naming is not intended to humiliate, but to preserve the integrity of the record and reflect the seriousness of the documented behavior.
While the individual has since responded publicly, the response has not addressed the core evidence. In such cases, visibility remains necessary. Selective rebuttal is not accountability.
Full evidence archive submitted to QPS, TEQSA, AHRC, and Ethics Australia: View here.
Image Credit:
Photograph cover taken by author in December 2024, in public setting. Used here solely for public ethics commentary and digital manipulation analysis.
Originally intended as a playful gesture, now serves as a public illustration of consistent disregard for accountability.
Read the full series
- Entry 1: The Man Who Taught Me Ethics by Failing All of Them
- Entry 2: The Disappearance of the Public Poet
- Entry 3: The Hanging Tree Case Study
- Entry 4: Hidden Like Accountability
- Entry 5: The Collapse of Assumptions
- Entry 6: The Ethics of a Tinder Bio
- Entry 7: How He Ate Told Me Everything
- Entry 8: What Makes a Scholar Dangerous
- Entry 9: Fragment of Life, Fragment of Accountability
- Entry 10: Anatomy of Disappointment
- Entry 11: Legal Defense Challenges: A Framing Statement
- Entry 12: Six Years After Ronell – What Academia Still Doesn’t Get
- Entry 13: QUT and The Man Who Raped Me
- Entry 14: Why Sarcasm Toward Institutions Can Backfire
- Entry 15: P*ssy or Toxic Masculinity?
- Entry 16: Who is Your Favorite Comedian?
- Entry 17: And What is Your Favorite Song?
- Entry 18: Grant Proposal — Narrative Ethics as Survivor-Led Forensics
- Entry 19: The Coward Behind the Clone
- Entry 20: [URGENT HIRE] CRISIS COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST
- Entry 21: [URGENT] Legal Counsel Needed for Complex Reputation Rehabilitation
- Entry 22: YOU’RE AN ABUSER. STOP CONTACTING ME
- Entry 23: Seeking Counsel for a Fallen Academic
- Entry 24: Internal Legal-PR Briefing
- Entry 25: For Journalists – Legal & Ethical Clearance Summary
- Entry 26: Symbolic Prostitution, Transactional Intimacy, or Just a “Loan”?
- Entry 28: Why He Simply Cannot Shut Up
- Entry 29: Forensic Commentary on “LARGE Language Muddle”
- Entry 30: Don’t Just Threaten My Future. Because I’m Going To Archive Your Present (you are here)
- Entry 31: Open Letter to the Person Who Tried to Break Me with Defamation
- Entry 32: Defamation, Harassment, Doxxing Class 101
- Entry 33: Confidential Crisis Recovery Proposal
- Entry 34: Forensic Behavioral-Somatic Report
- Entry 35: Forensic Commentary on the Tattoos
- Entry 36: QUT and the Abuser They Once Had
- Entry 38: When Poetry Becomes Revenge Porn
- Entry 40: A Man Built for Applause, Not Accountability
- Entry 41: Neurobehavioral Addendum
- Entry 43: Why Does It Sound Like a War Metaphor?
- Entry 44: Forensic Commentary on Racialized and Fetishizing Language in “Hidden Like Rice”
- Entry 45: Public Misuse of Former Academic Affiliation
- Entry 46: The Two Things That Didn’t Leave a Bad Impression
- Entry 47: When Affection is Just an Alibi (A Bundy-Inspired Reflection)
- Entry 48: Humbert, Lolita, and the Fetish of Fragility
- Entry 49: The Fetish of Smallness as Symbolic Violence
- Entry 50: Motif Risk Analysis
- Entry 52: Can an Abuser Be a Good Father?
- Entry 53: Who Protects the Children?
- Entry 54: From Blackmail to Children
- Reflection: The Miscalculation
(More entries coming soon)
→ [Back to Start: Introducing Mr. J, a Former Professor Series]
© 2025 Linh Ng. All rights reserved.
This publication is intended for educational and reflective purposes only.
Sharing the original link is welcomed and encouraged.
Please do not reproduce, redistribute, or translate this content — in whole or in part — without written permission.
This piece reflects both lived experience and critical analysis. It is not meant to be detached from its author or reframed without context.
Misuse or decontextualization may lead to formal clarification or takedown requests.
This work has been reviewed and quietly followed by scholars, educators, and ethics professionals across multiple sectors.
If your institution is engaging in critical discourse around narrative justice, symbolic coercion, or representational ethics, feel free to connect via Substack DMs or formal channels.
A regulatory case regarding this matter has already been classified under a protected status within national education integrity systems.
Should any reputational countermeasures or distortions arise, I reserve the right to publish the documented timeline, behavioral patterns, and contextual metadata.
All relevant documentation has been submitted through formal legal and regulatory pathways.